May 15, 2012
anticapitalist:

Our real first gay president
The new issue of Newsweek features a cover photo of President Obama topped by a rainbow-colored halo and captioned “The First Gay President.” The halo and caption strike me as cheap sensationalism. I realize airport travelers look at a magazine for 2.2 seconds before moving on to the next one. I grant that this cover will probably get Newsweek a 4.4 second glance. I also understand that Newsweek is desperate for sales. Nevertheless, I doubt that the Newsweek of old, before it was sold for a dollar, would have pandered as shallowly.
The caption is a superficial way to characterize an important development of thought that the president — along with the country — has been making over recent years. It is also entirely wrong. Like the mini-furor a couple of months back about the claim that Richard Nixon was our first gay president, the story simply ignores that the U.S. already had a gay president more than a century ago.
There can be no doubt that James Buchanan was gay, before, during and after his four years in the White House. Moreover, the nation knew it, too — he was not far into the closet.
Today, I know no historian who has studied the matter and thinks Buchanan was heterosexual. Fifteen years ago, historian John Howard, author of “Men Like That,” a pioneering study of queer culture in Mississippi, shared with me the key documents, including Buchanan’s May 13, 1844, letter to a Mrs. Roosevelt. Describing his deteriorating social life after his great love, William Rufus King, senator from Alabama, had moved to Paris to become our ambassador to France, Buchanan wrote:

I am now “solitary and alone,” having no companion in the house with me. I have gone a wooing to several gentlemen, but have not succeeded with any one of them. I feel that it is not good for man to be alone; and should not be astonished to find myself married to some old maid who can nurse me when I am sick, provide good dinners for me when I am well, and not expect from me any very ardent or romantic affection.

anticapitalist:

Our real first gay president

The new issue of Newsweek features a cover photo of President Obama topped by a rainbow-colored halo and captioned “The First Gay President.” The halo and caption strike me as cheap sensationalism. I realize airport travelers look at a magazine for 2.2 seconds before moving on to the next one. I grant that this cover will probably get Newsweek a 4.4 second glance. I also understand that Newsweek is desperate for sales. Nevertheless, I doubt that the Newsweek of old, before it was sold for a dollar, would have pandered as shallowly.

The caption is a superficial way to characterize an important development of thought that the president — along with the country — has been making over recent years. It is also entirely wrong. Like the mini-furor a couple of months back about the claim that Richard Nixon was our first gay president, the story simply ignores that the U.S. already had a gay president more than a century ago.

There can be no doubt that James Buchanan was gay, before, during and after his four years in the White House. Moreover, the nation knew it, too — he was not far into the closet.

Today, I know no historian who has studied the matter and thinks Buchanan was heterosexual. Fifteen years ago, historian John Howard, author of “Men Like That,” a pioneering study of queer culture in Mississippi, shared with me the key documents, including Buchanan’s May 13, 1844, letter to a Mrs. Roosevelt. Describing his deteriorating social life after his great love, William Rufus King, senator from Alabama, had moved to Paris to become our ambassador to France, Buchanan wrote:

I am now “solitary and alone,” having no companion in the house with me. I have gone a wooing to several gentlemen, but have not succeeded with any one of them. I feel that it is not good for man to be alone; and should not be astonished to find myself married to some old maid who can nurse me when I am sick, provide good dinners for me when I am well, and not expect from me any very ardent or romantic affection.

(Source: anticapitalist, via tannoreth)

  1. mxlxssa reblogged this from neil-gaiman
  2. freestylerobbery reblogged this from neil-gaiman
  3. sick-with-lisztomania reblogged this from merlions
  4. wyntonian reblogged this from merlions
  5. merlions reblogged this from tommilsom
  6. jagerben47 reblogged this from batlesbo
  7. the-yeah-yeah-nos reblogged this from aimmyarrowshigh
  8. sweetxsecret reblogged this from boxlunches
  9. panyav reblogged this from wilwheaton
  10. halloweenismybday reblogged this from neil-gaiman
  11. yourqueeroldersister reblogged this from rt-hon-harry-koschei-saxon
  12. clemonade reblogged this from tvversionperson
  13. tvversionperson reblogged this from thelastdogfighter and added:
    Huh. The more you know!
  14. sincerelyaok reblogged this from luna-in-ascetir
  15. luna-in-ascetir reblogged this from malindalo
  16. deadchinadoll reblogged this from sofonisbaanguissola
  17. barbitone reblogged this from neil-gaiman
  18. cosmogyros reblogged this from pricklylegs
  19. wilderebellion reblogged this from sayserasera
  20. ruizhi reblogged this from aimmyarrowshigh
  21. thebraveandmischievous reblogged this from verie
  22. itsaboutthemen16-gaymiscellany reblogged this from wilwheaton
  23. confidentlycomatose reblogged this from lzrdgrl
  24. stina13 reblogged this from tyrhannahsaurus
  25. toneynoise reblogged this from anticapitalist
  26. wanderingoff reblogged this from neil-gaiman